dont send presuit demands
"What were your key takeaways from the program? dont send presuit demands"
Free Shipping on Orders Over $200
Each user must register individually as they will need their own login to access the program.
Trial attorney Michael Neff is a nationally known premises liability lawyer who’s obtained verdicts of $47 million, $35 million, and other substantial verdicts and settlements in premises liability cases.
In this video, Michael Neff covers pre- and post-litigation demand letters in premises liability cases. Along the way, he addresses negligent security cases, defective design, failure to inspect, failure to maintain, and slip-and-fall cases. He also discusses offensively using fraudulent transfer law and spoliation motions in your cases. This video is a valuable companion to Michael Neff’s book, Premises Liability: A Guide to Success.
Premises Liability Demand Lett PROMO.mp4 from Trial Guides on Vimeo.
On Demand Program: 60 minutes
Original Air Date: 06/28/2019
Overall rating: 4.5 / 5 from 6 reviews.
Review topics: [chance, ideas].
"What were your key takeaways from the program? dont send presuit demands"
"What were your key takeaways from the program? Be ready"
"What were your key takeaways from the program? Post-Suit Demands Which topics did you find least valuable and why? Everything was helpful."
"What were your key takeaways from the program? 30b6 before demand; presuit demands can be a wast of time Which topics did you find least valuable and why? n/a"
"What were your key takeaways from the program? I thought he broke down the concepts really well and gave some strong take away points. My only wish is that he had an opportunity to go through each type of premises case and what is needed a little bit more Which topics did you find least valuable and why? There was nothing that he spoke about that I felt was not helpful or important to know. I just wish I could have had the opportunity to learn a little more from him"
"What were your key takeaways from the program? I thought he broke down the concepts really well and gave some strong take away points. My only wish is that he had an opportunity to go through each type of premises case and what is needed a little bit more Which topics did you find least valuable and why? There was nothing that he spoke about that I felt was not helpful or important to know. I just wish I could have had the opportunity to learn a little more from him"