Free Shipping on Orders Over $200
Selecting a Nuclear Jury with Time Limits & No Cause Challenges...
Many judges now impose increasingly strict time limits on voir dire. They may also limit the questions you can ask and how you ask them. In some cases, they may deny your dismissals for cause—even when potential jurors admit bias.
How do you consistently select jurors who are prepared to award full, fair verdicts without hours of voir dire or the luxury of cause challenges? Join renowned trial consultant Harry Plotkin as he shows how to overcome these limitations when selecting your jury.
Plotkin will demonstrate the voir dire questions and jury selection approaches he used in three recent verdicts:
In all three trials, the lawyers were given less than one hour for voir dire and granted no cause challenges by the judge. Jury selection concluded within one day.
Plotkin argues that relying on an exhaustive voir dire process and challenges—both peremptory and for cause—is a mistake. In this webinar, he will explain how to:
Isn’t it time to rethink what conventional wisdom taught you about jury trials? Discover a whole new approach in this exciting new webinar.
Click here for Access Instructions for On Demand Programs.
Each user must register individually as they will need their own login to access the program.
On Demand Program: 87 Minutes
Original Air Date: 07/02/2024
Overall rating: 4.757576 / 5 from 33 reviews.
This webinar teaches how to effectively select jurors for a nuclear jury with strict time limits and no cause challenges. It emphasizes the importance of assessing jurors' deepest values and avoiding superficial judgments. Renowned trial consultant Harry Plotkin shares strategies used in high-stakes trials to ensure fair verdicts.
Review topics: ["questions","jurors","information","topics","pointers"].
"What were your key takeaways from the program? Don't judge a juror by their job or demographic info. Dig deep into their life experience on key issues. One good question is worth more than a thousand bad questions. Which topics did you find least valuable and why? None, all of it was valuable. Wish he addressed voir dire on an admitted liability case where damages are the key issue."
"What were your key takeaways from the program? I've watched several presentations on jury selection. This one felt too off the cuff considering the price."
"What were your key takeaways from the program? You can do this."
"What were your key takeaways from the program? Don’t rely on conventional demographics to decide if a potential juror is good or bad for you. Dig deeper for feelings and attitudes. Which topics did you find least valuable and why? All topics were valuable and relevant."
"What were your key takeaways from the program? Get to the issues asap. What were your key takeaways from the program? Get to the issues asap."
"What were your key takeaways from the program? Prehab. Be more open minded, not to automatically strike jurors. Which topics did you find least valuable and why? Some of the examples questions he gave."
"What were your key takeaways from the program? The best way to ask open ended questions."
"What were your key takeaways from the program? I appreciated getting views of questions to get the jury talking and how to evaluate good and bad jurors."
"What were your key takeaways from the program? Listen and ask smart questions."
"What were your key takeaways from the program? Great information."
Many judges now impose increasingly strict time limits on voir dire. They may also limit the questions you can ask and how you ask them. In some cases, they may deny your dismissals for cause—even when potential jurors admit bias.
How do you consistently select jurors who are prepared to award full, fair verdicts without hours of voir dire or the luxury of cause challenges? Join renowned trial consultant Harry Plotkin as he shows how to overcome these limitations when selecting your jury.
Plotkin will demonstrate the voir dire questions and jury selection approaches he used in three recent verdicts:
In all three trials, the lawyers were given less than one hour for voir dire and granted no cause challenges by the judge. Jury selection concluded within one day.
Plotkin argues that relying on an exhaustive voir dire process and challenges—both peremptory and for cause—is a mistake. In this webinar, he will explain how to:
Isn’t it time to rethink what conventional wisdom taught you about jury trials? Discover a whole new approach in this exciting new webinar.
Click here for Access Instructions for On Demand Programs.
Each user must register individually as they will need their own login to access the program.
Format
