Use this at my next trial.
"What were your key takeaways from the program? I have purchased many Dominoes sets and plan to use this at my next trial! Thank you!"
Proximate Cause, Preponderance of Evidence & Jury Bias at Trial...
$100.00
Unit price
/
Unavailable
Description
Description
Jurors are often unfamiliar with concepts like “preponderance of the evidence” and “proximate cause,” yet your jury’s ability to understand them is a key component of any civil trial. Add in the constant issue of jurors who are biased against plaintiffs and their lawyers and you have a volatile mixture waiting to blow up your case.
Many potential jurors think that civil cases have the same standard as the kind of over-the-top criminal cases they see portrayed on TV. And a good number of those same jurors will also have been poisoned against you by the aggressive marketing that many attorneys constantly flood them with–not to mention years of insurance industry propaganda. Defense lawyers work to take advantage of these obstacles and often fight tooth and nail on liability–especially in cases with soft-tissue and other invisible injuries.
Trial lawyer Edward P. Capozzi has picked over two hundred juries during his career and has developed successful strategies to counter juror bias, prove proximate cause, and explain to jurors–in clear and convincing terms–how his client’s case has met the correct standard of proof. In this 60-minute CLE program, Capozzi will walk you through:
- Confronting anti-plaintiff bias in jury selection
- Educating the jury on the preponderance of evidence standard and how to loop it through your case from jury selection to summation
- Proving proximate cause with compelling demonstrations and arguments that cut through the opaque legalese that often harms jurors’ ability to understand and act
Register today to gain useful insights and practical tools you can immediately adopt in your next trial to counter these potentially case-killing issues.
Click here for Access Instructions for Webinars.
Each user must register individually as they will need their own login to access the program and comply with CLE requirements.
Need accreditation in another jurisdiction? Fill out this form and note Course No. 240925D00
Details
Details
On Demand Program: 64 Minutes
Original Air Date: 09/25/2024
Accreditation
Accreditation
Approved and Pending Credits
Click Here
Accreditation Not Available
MO, VA
We will apply for accreditation in your state upon request. Please use the form at the bottom of the product description to request accreditation in your state.
Overall rating: 4.75 / 5 from 16 reviews.
AI Generated Review Summary
Summary topics
Review topics: ["examples"].
Review highlights
Reviews
Language for verdict form.
"What were your key takeaways from the program? I like ""probably"" language for verdict form!"
How to use the domino theory boxes.
"What were your key takeaways from the program? How to use the domino theory boxes."
Everything.
"What were your key takeaways from the program? Everything was good."
The importance of giving
"What were your key takeaways from the program? The importance of giving a good example for preponderance of the evidence vs reasonable doubt and how to handle jury bias on advertisiing Which topics did you find least valuable and why? Proximate cause but only because I found the other two more valuable"
effectively dealing with
"What were your key takeaways from the program? effectively dealing with proximate cause, common sense logical example using domino theory... i've lost admitted liability cases when jury couldn't get over proximate cause of injuries... sucks... this approach simplifies the concept in a way that i think minimizes the chances of losing a good case because the jury "didn't get it" Which topics did you find least valuable and why? n/a"
Dominos
"What were your key takeaways from the program? Dominos Which topics did you find least valuable and why? Prox Cause"
Ed Capozzi is a genius
"What were your key takeaways from the program? Ed Capozzi is a genius and my guru on all things "personal injury" Which topics did you find least valuable and why? none - all of his topics are valuable"
I really appreciate
"What were your key takeaways from the program? I really appreciate the use of the easel pad in the CLE because that's what we're doing at trial. Which topics did you find least valuable and why? It was all great"
explaining legal defense
"What were your key takeaways from the program? explaining legal cause Which topics did you find least valuable and why? Nothing"
