Start early.
"What were your key takeaways from the program? Start early with evidence."
Free Shipping on Orders Over $200
* Plaintiff-only product
In traumatic brain injury cases, defense counsel will frequently attack your client using overt or subtle claims of malingering or exaggeration. These arguments are even more frequent when your client has experienced a mild traumatic brain injury.
In this 60-minute program trial attorney Andrew Abraham will show how to aggressively and proactively attack the malingering/exaggerating defense, all the way from intake to trial. Abraham will cover:
Click here for Access Instructions for On Demand Programs.
Each user must register individually as they will need their own login to access the program and comply with CLE requirements.
Need accreditation in another jurisdiction? Fill out this form and note Course No. 250501D00
* Plaintiff-only product
Thank you for your interest in a plaintiffs-only product
Part of what makes our materials so unique is that many of them are not available to attorneys who do any type of civil defense work, so the training you’re about to purchase is solely available to civil plaintiff and criminal defense attorneys. This product is also not available to the general public.
As such, prior to purchase we require all customers to enter into a Binding Agreement with Trial Guides that both ensures that this training reaches its intended audience and also protects us from an intellectual property and distribution (sharing) standpoint.
You will be prompted to sign the agreement before you check out.
On Demand Program: 62 Minutes
Original Air Date: 05/06/2025
Approved and Pending Credits
Click Here
Accreditation Not Available
MO, VA
We will apply for accreditation in your state upon request. Please use the form at the bottom of the product description to request accreditation in your state.
Overall rating: 4.714286 / 5 from 7 reviews.
Review topics: [].
"What were your key takeaways from the program? Start early with evidence."
"What were your key takeaways from the program? There are several ways to undercut defense experts and defense of malingering; before and after witness; attacking Glascow coma scale; validity scales in MMPI are designed for normal people not brain injured; many studies which contradict defense expert opinion that most people with TBIs make full recovery Which topics did you find least valuable and why? I found all of it valuable to my practice."
"What were your key takeaways from the program? I liked the reliance on the CDC articles, which led me to other articles from their website. Guidance on MMPI was also helpful."
"What were your key takeaways from the program? Good work teaching on the malingering questions. Which topics did you find least valuable and why? It was all good even if some like GCS was redundant"
"What were your key takeaways from the program? I liked the idea of using before and after witnesses that were not family members or friends."
"What were your key takeaways from the program? The medical literature and the importance of working up a case and learning about the neurometabolic cascade sequence."
"What were your key takeaways from the program? Great reference material."