Trying a case is more
"What were your key takeaways from the program? Trying a case is more feel than mechanical Which topics did you find least valuable and why? Voir dire"
Free Shipping on Orders Over $200
Click here for Access Instructions for On Demand Programs.
Each attendee must register individually as they will need their own login to access the event.
In this 90-minute voir dire and opening statement video, lawyers Eric Fong and Ben Wells will share some of the strategies they’ve used to get historic verdicts and earn awards and widespread recognition as cutting edge, nationally respected, and feared trial attorneys. This program will focus on how to get your case out of the gates with a winning formula for an effective voir dire and powerful opening statement.
Fong and Wells will discuss their strategies for:
Eric Fong is a trial lawyer with an impressive career with over a hundred cases tried to a verdict. Some of his landmark cases include the creation of the constitutional right of intimate association in Washington State, where Fong protected the rights of low-income housing residents against oppressive “crime control” measures. He obtained the largest compensatory verdict in Washington State history, $91,000,000. With cases ranging from murder to white-collar crime, and medical malpractice to toxic fume cases, few lawyers can match Fong’s breadth of experience in various fields of law. Eric Fong is a frequent lecturer at the Trial Lawyers College and has held leadership positions with several well-known legal organizations.
Ben Wells has devoted over twenty-five years of his life to the representation of people who have been injured physically, emotionally, or financially by the negligence or malpractice of others. He has handled nearly a thousand cases during his career. And although a vast majority were injury cases, he has also represented people who have been victimized by the malpractice of professionals or from criminal acts such as assault or sexual abuse. His recent results include several multimillion-dollar jury verdicts and settlements.
On Demand Program: 90 Minutes
Original Air Date: 02/10/2022
Accreditation is not being offered for this On Demand Program.
Overall rating: 4.7454543 / 5 from 55 reviews.
Review topics: ["trial","presentation","practice","strategies","information","jury","topics"].
"What were your key takeaways from the program? Trying a case is more feel than mechanical Which topics did you find least valuable and why? Voir dire"
"What were your key takeaways from the program? So many things! The strategy for developing outline for opening was awesome. I was really struck by how they both practiced what they preached. Their own interactions with each other, with Jessica, and with the questioners were so kind and validating that it really led credence to everything they were saying. Loved the combo. Which topics did you find least valuable and why? The beginning was a little slow, I thought, maybe just a little too much spirituality talk."
"What were your key takeaways from the program? You have to care about people to be able to reach them. Which topics did you find least valuable and why? the voir dire process"
"What were your key takeaways from the program? Importance of crafting and telling a compelling narrative. Forming the jury is the most important part of the trial. Which topics did you find least valuable and why? None. All of the content was valuable."
"What were your key takeaways from the program? vulnerability and compassion Which topics did you find least valuable and why? N/A"
"What were your key takeaways from the program? Authenticity Story telling consciously Which topics did you find least valuable and why? na"
"What were your key takeaways from the program? Don't be afraid to be creative. Don't be afraid just to be real and vulnerable. Which topics did you find least valuable and why?"
"What were your key takeaways from the program? Do a "day in the life" where the collision affected client's life even in small ways. Replacement value of what was taken by using car analogy Listening to a juror during voir dire examination and speaking less. Which topics did you find least valuable and why? No problem with any of the topics covered. Would have liked a brief outline of the presentation to follow along during the presentation."
"What were your key takeaways from the program? The importance of connecting with the jurors on a human level was very effectively shown."
"What were your key takeaways from the program? Authenticity during voir dire and openings. Sharing from the heart. Which topics did you find least valuable and why? All was relevant, as I have a trial in a few weeks."